Experiment File

首页 > Experiment File

短 刷 阅 编 历

本WIKI是玩家自建的WIKI，与官方有合作但不要将本WIKI视作官方站点哦~WIKI部分内容与图片由官方提供，转载请注明出处，禁止任何商业用途。
欢迎

点此

将本WIKI添加到桌面或是

点此加入

Q群。Firefox等浏览器浏览本站可能会出现部分样式问题。人手有限可能会延迟更新，可查看WIKI计划表页面。

MediaWiki:Timer

12024/06/27 0:0:0本页面上次更新 ，请注意本页面内容时效性

0

0-1-0 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	0-1-0	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

0-0-1 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	0-0-1	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

0-0-2 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	0-0-2	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

0-1-3 Helena Adams

A Page from Helena Adams's Experiment File

A Page from Helena Adams's Experiment File
No	0-0-3 (corrected to 0-1-3 afterwards)	Name	Helena Adams	Inclination	The perfect "control group"
Test Indicators
1. Kindness		2. Taming		3. Self-protection
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	A manic at heart, she was tamed by her own conscience and education. Her self-awareness was sound and her mentality was mature. She should have been an ideal control group, but she turned out to be easily tamed and difficult to control.
	2. Methodology	After multiple test with No. 0-1-0 in the early phase, we conducted pharmaceutical interventions in stages with a more reasonable dosage (according to data) on No. 0-0-3. Early on in the experiment, No. 0-0-3 showed excessive compassion and care toward No. 0-0-4 as they were both "lambs." She also showed kindness toward No. 0-1-0 as she considered them "allies." No. 0-0-3 was wary of No. 0-0-1 throughout, who was more mysterious and overbearing. As the experiment progressed, No. 0-0-3 became excessively compassionate. This affected her otherwise sane mind and led her to making incorrect judgements in extreme situations. She gradually fell into No. 0-0-4's trap and became the only punisher in the game. When the "truth" was exposed, the shock from the cognitive deviation and immense guilt shattered No. 0-0-3's protective shell for her personality. This seemed to have created an ideal environment for the drug. Yet the results of the experiment were far from what we had expected.
	3. Analysis Summary	As Sullivan's prey, I decided that No. 0-0-3 should have been the prefect control group based on her early exchanges with Sullivan. At the beginning of the experiment, her behavior proved our point—she was too kind and easily tamed. In conventional cases, once a control group has been "broken," it would rapidly experiment into the experimental group. Perhaps there was certain unavoidable misinformation about her recent developments. During the "uncontrollable" stage, No. 0-0-3 was unsurprisingly resistant. This ultimately negated the experimental results we expected. We currently can't determine whether it was the instability and insufficiency of the medicine, or No. 0-0-3's inherent characteristics, that led to such results.

0-0-4 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	0-0-4	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

3

3-?-1 Aesop Carl

A Page from Aesop Carl's Experiment File

A Page from Aesop Carl's Experiment File
No	3-?-1	Name	Aesop Carl	Inclination	A dangerous character who appears stable on the surface.
Test Indicators
1. Motivated		2. Apathy		3. Cognitive Bias
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	No. 3-?-1 followed the rules and was emotionally stable. Apart from being extremely introverted, there wasn't any obvious trait. However, his past gave him an unconventional view on life and death. His only motivation stemmed from his desire to guide those who had been struggling to end their life with dignity. As a result of his clear goal and strong motivation, No. 3-1-2 and No. 3-1-4 were eliminated because of him.
	2. Methodology	Except for No. 3-1-4, all of the subjects in this group share similar traits, quiet, low-key, recluse, and avoid confrontations at all cost. Early on in the experiment, No. 3-?-1 and No. 3-?-3 were attracted to each other. Such attraction came from both No. 3-?-3's obsession with letters and No. 3-?-1's appreciation of his ideal. As things went as planned, No. 3-?-1, with a clear goal, followed the rules and remained stable. Once we used medication on No. 3-1-2 and 3-1-4, the stability was gone. No. 3-1-2's anxiety was triggered, eventually affecting No. 3-1-4 who was also troubled by their past. Yet No. 3-?-1 wasn't affected at this point. It wasn't until the prey went missing that No. 3-1-4 lost their cool and became extremely violent, and the plan was interrupted, forcing No. 3-?-1 to show his inner personality.
	3. Experiment Summary	Affected by his upbringing and education background, No. 3-?-1 had an unconventional view of life, he thought there was no difference between life and death, and that it was his calling to guide those who had been struggling to end their lives with dignity. No. 3-?-1 knew full well that the effect of his past on his mentality was different from the others in the group. This affected his rational judgment. Therefore, while No. 3-?-1's appearance and behavior were normal, his cognitive awareness drove him to extreme actions. Early on in the experiment, No. 3-?-1 and No. 3-?-3 clicked not because of their reliance on each other as allies or companions but their shared gaze on rare prey as predators. Once the prey was lost, No. 3-?-1 was triggered to eliminate No. 3-1-4, who interrupted his plan, and to make it his goal to eliminate No. 3-1-2. This showed how cold No. 3-?-1's reaction was toward external emotional triggers. His internal motivation to achieve his goal was the only factor that affected his behavior. In this case, only when his plan was affected and his actions were interrupted can one truly understand his nature based on his response.

3-1-2 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	3-1-2	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

3-?-3 Victor Granz

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	3-?-3	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

3-1-4 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	3-1-4	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

4

4-1-1 Emma Woods

A Page from Emma Woods' Experiment File

A Page from Emma Woods' Experiment File
No	4-1-1	Name	Emma Woods	Inclination	Doubtful "Dreamer"
Test Indicators
1. Seemingly innocuous		2. Neurotic		3. Vindictive
Test Results	1.	Subject 4-1-1 is an insecure individual. When placed in an unfamiliar environment, she exhibits a strong emotional dependence on certain items for self-protection and loses herself in delusions.
	2. Procedure	Facing three revenge targets in the Manor (Subjects 4-0-2, 4-0-3, and 4-0-4), Subject 4-1-1 disguised her intentions under the image of the innocent sweetheart to execute her plan. However, when alone, Subject 4-1-1 directed her emotional dependence toward the Scarecrow due to the stress and pressure of her revenge plan.
	3. Experiment Summary	Subject 4-1-1 indulges in fantasies and projects them onto objects, a behavioral pattern that originates from repeated abandonment and betrayal in her childhood and adolesence. These experiences have taken root in her memories and kept her mind in fear and tension for a long time. The medicine used in this experiment magnified her inner fear and anxiety, resulting in the vessel of her fantasies becoming a "talking scarecrow." It was Subject 4-0-4 who forced a change in the situation. After discovering the delusions of Subject 4-1-1, Subject 4-0-4 was still willing to listen, accept, and trust her. Subject 4-1-1 gained a real sense of security in her relationship with Subject 4-0-4, and her dependence on the scarecrow gradually lessened. Thus, Subject 4-0-4 went from being a revenge target to the focus of dependence in Subject 4-1-1's mind. In contrast, during this process, Subject 4-1-1 persisted in her revenge plan against Subject 4-0-2. In the game, Subject 4-1-1 burned the scarecrow to symbolize her revenge. This shows that her emotional attachment to this item had been completely overcome and placed on Subject 4-0-4. However... (this experiment file is incomplete and will be altered and corrected at a later date)

4-0-2 Kreacher Pierson

A Page from Kreacher Pierson's Experiment File

A Page from Kreacher Pierson's Experiment File
No	4-0-2	Name	Kreacher Pierson	Inclination	A petty, greedy, and selfish person. His lack of foresight made 4-0-2 suffer from his own "cleverness."
Test Indicators
1. Selfish		2. Aggressive and Competitive		3. Role-playing
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	4-0-2 was the first subject to be eliminated from the game. He was immobilized by Subject 4-1-1's trap in the manor. As for whether he really recalled Subject 4-1-1's identity? Nobody knows.
	2. Methodology	Subject 4-0-2's attempts to frame Subject 4-0-3 were reckless and immature, which is enough to show that 4-0-2 is an aggressive and competitive subject who likes to think that he's smarter than everyone else. Studies show Subject 4-0-2's personality is the result of his poverty-stricken upbringing. Subject 4-0-2 wandered the streets from a young age. Deception has always been his way of survival, and he has never been treated with sincerity and kindness. So, when Subject 4-1-1 showed concern, Subject 4-0-2 fell for it immediately. When he was with Subject 4-1-1, his wit slowed down, his greed turned into a weakness, and his delusion of grandeur became his downfall.
	3. Experiment Summary	Subject 4-0-2's street-smart and survival instincts were the last bit of "knowledge" he had: Instead of dying from starvation or sickness on the streets, he felt that exploiting orphans' disabilities to gain sympathy from begging and stealing was the most practical and economical way for survival. This resulted in the formation of Subject 4-0-2's contradictory personality of inferiority and pride. He lived freely on the streets and even named himself the "King" of the orphans. But in the high society that he so desperately tried to get in, he was just a nobody with low self-esteem to the point of stuttering from nervousness. It's obvious that Subject 4-0-2 tends to role-play. He took the role of a "King" among the orphans, a thief before the church, and an empathetic scarecrow when with Subject 4-1-1. It was a trap that seemed so bizarre, yet it also made sense.

4-0-3 Freddy Riley

A Page from Freddy Riley's Experiment File

A Page from Freddy Riley's Experiment File
No	4-0-3	Name	Freddy Riley	Inclination	Profiteering "Hypocrite"
Test Indicators
1. Liar		2. Lover		3. Unscrupulous
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	In all respects, No. 4-0-3 is a very standard test subject, hypocritical, cruel, arrogant, and so lofty. The petri dish created by ambition allows his evilness to be presented in the most typical way, and revenge becomes a better catalyst than drugs.
	2. Procedure	In the preparation phase of the experiment, No. 4-0-3 showed strong hostility to No. 4-0-2 and showed varying degrees of alertness to No. 4-1-1 and No. 4-0-4. All these kept him at a distance from other subjects. In the conflict between No. 4-0-2 and him, No. 4-0-3 exposed his enmity against No. 4-0-2, culminating in a higher risk of punishment. But considering that there were no more suitable test subjects to make up for the time being in this round of experiments, no eradicative punishment had been conducted for No. 4-0-3. Referring to the newly collected information in the first phase, we induced No. 4-0-3 in the second phase of the experiment, allowing him to receive the key information set for him in advance. No. 4-0-3's hostility changed from No. 4-0-4. In this phase, his behavior towards No. 4-0-4 was more cautious and purposeful than in the first phase, but this behavioral characteristic was limited to his exchanges with No. 4-0-4, making him less careful against the deadlier threat.
	3. Experiment Summary	As far as No. 4-0-3 was concerned, in the early stage of the experiment, all the behavioral goals of No. 4-0-3 originated from his class superiority and his desire to maximize benefits. These socialized behavior motives may be negative. But in fact, these were what made him maintain a high level of vigilance in the preset environment of the experiment, creating a safe zone different from other experimental subjects. This was until a more individualized source of motivation that he himself defined as "love" dominated. The negative behavior that bred based on this positive motive, revenge, caused greater trauma to the target while destroying No. 4-0-3's defensive shell, so that he shielded the vigilance towards outside the target, completely exposing himself to the real danger. It is worth noticing that the actual arrival time of No. 4-0-2 did not match the expectation, which affected the drug use sequence of No. 4-0-3 and No. 4-0-4 to a certain extent, and caused some trouble in the experimental process. But at least, it did not seem to have much impact on the experimental results themselves. However, considering the diversity of subsequent experiments, this risk needs to be further avoided. Do not use drugs blindly until the experimental environment is sufficiently stable. Moreover, this experiment also proved that verifying certain experimental conclusions does not necessarily require pharmaceutical intervention.

4-0-4 Emily Dyer

A Page from Emily Dyer's Experiment File

A Page from Emily Dyer's Experiment File
No	4-0-4	Name	Emily Dyer	Inclination	A "sinner" seeking salvation.
Test Indicators
1. Attention seeking		2. Compassion		3. Salvation
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Due to No. 4-0-4's professional background and experience, I was guarded about her arrival. However, the years she spent fleeing and her own inner torment have dulled her observation skills and judgment. She has thus become a sufficiently safe experiment subject.
	2. Methodology	As intended by the experiment, No. 4-0-4 was overly concerned about and protective toward No. 4-1-1. This inclination escalated as the experiment progressed until it deteriorated. At the beginning of the experiment, this inclination of No. 4-0-4 was limited to sending friendly signals to No. 4-1-1 and offering protection. Midway through, No. 4-0-4 realized how dangerous No. 4-1-1 was. Instead of keeping her distance, she elevated her initial protective measures to preventions against potential threats. During this time, due to key information released on No. 4-0-3, No. 4-0-4 was exposed to danger. In fact, No. 4-0-4 was aware of this, yet she acted as if she didn't care. Such a typical behavior was verified toward the end of the experiment—between eliminating the security risk against No. 4-1-1 and using the security risk to pass on the threat against her own safety, she chose the former.
	3. Experiment Summary	The effect of No. 4-0-4 acting as the tie among the experiment subjects in this group exceeded expectations. Our initial premise of the experiment was that she should act as a catalyst for No. 4-1-1 and No. 4-0-3. However, due to complicated past of her and No. 4-1-1, as well as their linked emotions of being in a dangerous situation, a new possibility arose in the experiment's results regarding No. 4-1-1. While this possibility wasn't put into effect, it offered a new approach for subsequent experiments. At the same time, my observation of No. 4-0-4 made me realize it's relatively difficult to accurately observe and control any experimental effect arising from guilt. When prioritizing redemption and salvation, subjective conscience and objective facts affect each other constantly. Despite the massive amount of supportive data from the experiment subjects, chance still plays a big part and so it's not suitable for use in this phase of the experiment.

5

5-?-4 Kevin Ayuso

A Page from Kevin Ayuso's Experiment File

A Page from Kevin Ayuso's Experiment File
No	5-?-4	Name	Kevin Ayuso	Inclination	A coward boasting freedom while being trapped by guilt.
Test Indicators
1. Self-denial		2. Moral extremism		3. Emotional impulsivity
Test Results (phased)	1. Overall Evaluation	No. 5-?-4 didn't participate in the "game" as planned. Yet his premature exit became a "catalyst" and sped up the progress of the experiment.
	2. Procedure	It was easy to see through 5-?-4's established logic of thinking. One only needs to manipulate his guilty conscience and moral extremism and he could have been a reliable and controllable variable for the experiment. However, it's a really risky yet creative decision to put No. 5-?-4 and No. 5-?-5 in the same group for the experiment. The contact between the two was sensible but unexpected. As No. 5-?-4 didn't join the "game" segment, my observations on him were "phased." This was also a revelation—the "game" may not require the participation of all subject in the experiment.
	3. Phased Summary	The way No. 5-?-4 gets along with others is worth pondering about: During the experiment, No. 5-?-4 had vastly different prejudice against females and males. No. 5-?-4 was protective of females irrespective of their race, status, and stance. His "altruistic behavior" towards females far exceeded what one may do for the other sex. Taking his pasts into account, I am of the view that he's projecting his guilt toward the person from his adolescence on to other females. On top of that, he's being over-protective so as to relieve his fear that the tragedy would repeat itself (this was really obvious from his contact with No. 5-?-5 in the latter part of the experiment). This can be seen as a form of self protection psychologically. No. 5-?-4's negative attitude towards males is relatively complicated. On the surface, it seems to be an exaggerated competition with those of the same sex. However, it also originated from his self-perceived cowardice and selfishness arising from the experience during his adolescence as mentioned above. He often projected such negative self-perception on to other males. For example, he would disregard a male's appearance, attitude, and stance and compare them to wolves, cows, eagles, horses, and other familiar animals based merely on their word and actions. He would then label them as mean, brutal, cowardly to attack them. This is totally subjective prejudice. In other words, when there's a conflict between a male and a female, he would subconciously treat the female as the person who needed protection back then and the male as the "helpless" boy he once was whom one should take caution with. In this sense, he will always be trapped by his own guilt.

5-?-5 Patricia Dorval

A Page from Patricia Dorval's Experiment File

A Page from Patricia Dorval's Experiment File
No	5-?-5	Name	Patricia Dorval	Inclination	Pagan huntress
Test Indicators
1. Pious		2. Pompous		3. Agressive
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	No. 5-?-5 is a devout and effective pagan with a clear goal.
	2. Procedure	The medicine wasn't stable and so it wasn't put to use in this group's experiment. As a result, the judgement and behavior of the subjects in this group were completely driven by their own personality and stance. No. 5-?-5 was the core for this group's contradictions. No. 5-?-5 upheld her promise with the "gods" by sacrificing her "preys," which was also her motivation for joining the manor's game. Yet throughout the game, there wasn't any objective proof that the "gods" actually gave No. 5-?-5 any assistance or protection.
	3. Analysis Summary	No. 5-?-5's behavioral pattern wasn't purely religious, it's also related to her desire for self-identification. As she wasn't accepted by her own people and she grew up being discriminated, No. 5-?-5 was very sensitive to her identity. Her wish for "the gods' approval" became her most urgent desire as she sought approval among her people. In the process of fulfilling her promise with the "gods," she unapolagetically put herself in opposition to outsiders, contantly measuring their behavior against the standard of "preys." Such condescending and mean-spirited attitude brought a lot of criticism and prejudice toward her, leading to No. 5-?-5's self-perception as an "undesirable person." This expains why No. 5-?-5 wasn't moved by No. 5-?-4's kindness. In stark contrast to the hostile "hunting" process, No. 5-?-5 decided that fate of preys in a very naive way—no matter how tricky the sacrifical technique, the key to the success of the ritual was "wether the prey can repent before the gods": the prey must accept their past in order to escape from their predicament. Yet No. 5-?-5 never had a chance to do the same but to face the scorn and prejudice imposed by the past head on. Gaining satisfaction from the redemption of the prey, this is the unique tenderness of the huntress. As to whether such beliefs will actually be reciprocated, the next set of experiments can go further on this point...

6

6-1-1 Eli Clark

A Page from Eli Clark's Experiment File

A Page from Eli Clark's Experiment File
No	6-1-1	Name	Eli Clark	Test Trend	A so-called "seer" who knows nothing
Test Indicators
1. Cautious (a result of the psychological burden of his "Foresight")		2. Abnormally high self-esteem		3. Desires fame and fortune
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	The first uninvited guest of the Manor. Interestingly, his performance has exceeded expectations.
	2. Analysis Summary	a. Similar to the previous tests, the source of his malicious intent stems from suspicion. Under duress, the reasonable introduction of "bait" in the form of unequal interests can serve to stimulate, or even enlarge, this malicious intent. b. This is the first recorded instance of "Foresight." Currently, there are insufficient experimental results to support it and, as such, it cannot be clearly defined. More empirical data is required. However, based on the test results of Subject 6-1-1, if notions of mysticism (such as the soul of predicting the future) must be involved, the Lakeside Village test site would serve as the best location for stimulating such an ability. With regards to future experimentation, procuring subjects such as 6-1-1 and conducting focused observation in Lakeside Village are advised. c. The ability to predict the future does not guarantee the ability to alter it. Experimental results for Subject 6-1-1 show that, even when auxiliary circumstances deviate from a probable outcome, the developmental curve of events will eventually approach said outcome. As shown in the first two pages of Subject 6-1-1's behavior during the experiment, he refused to accept the foreseen outcome and made various attempts to change it (including but not limited to removing potential obstructions). Surprisingly, the series of choices he made ultimately resulted in the initial predicted outcome. It is unfortunate that there is only one recorded experiment for Subject 6-1-1, and that the result aligned with the prediction. As the experiment can no longer be repeated, the following conjecture cannot be verified as true: Was Subject 6-1-1 truly unable to alter the future through his own choices, or did the behavior of the other three test subjects decide the final outcome? As far as this point is concerned, perhaps other would be more willing to view this as akin to the ouroboros. d. The cheaters who can see the future are the ones who know the least. This is the most interesting aspect of this set of experiments. When I first saw the test subjects, I would never have deduced that the "seer" would be their own demise, or that the "honest" would defeat the "cheater."

6-1-2 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	6-1-2	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

6-1-3 Fiona Gilman

A Page from Fiona Gilman's Experiment File

A Page from Fiona Gilman's Experiment File
No	6-1-3	Name	Fiona Gilman	Inclination	Prophesying according to her insight into the "will of the divine."
Test Indicators
1. Self-confident and skeptical		2. Romantic		3. Prophetic
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	No. 6-1-3 uses her extensive education and philosophical mind in search of the truth of her faith—a truth of her own construction.
	2. Methodology	No. 6-1-3 arrived perfectly on schedule. Given her understanding of the situation, No. 6-1-3 quickly chose No. 6-0-5 as her first target for investigation. Initially, No. 6-1-3 saw uninterrupted progress, eventually leading to her taking over the entirety of the project. However, following the unfortunate accident that claimed No. 6-1-2's life, No. 6-1-3 began showing a keen interest in No. 6-0-5 and the Lakeside Village. This, in turn, brought her to the attention of No. 6-0-5 and No. 6-1-4. Following the introduction of No. 6-1-6, No. 6-1-3 was almost able to avoid being "sacrificed" by No. 6-0-5 due to her extraordinary intuition. A moment's hesitation, however, caused No. 6-1-3 to miss a crucial piece of "divine insight," and lose her chance to escape.
	3. Analysis Summary	After confirming the stability of the medicine's effects, I decided to extend an invitation to No. 6-0-5. For the longest time, I lacked a large enough control group, but that all changed after No. 6-1-3 appeared. A candidate "provided" to me by an old friend, No. 6-1-3 has the potential to bring this entire experiment to an unfortunate and premature end. However, a unique test subject such as herself is more than worth the risk. This has been, without a doubt, my most dangerous experiment to date, as well as my most successful one. No. 6-1-3 is intelligent, alert, and highly motivated, and her special abilities allowed us to discover a fragment of the truth lying at the bottom of the lake. No. 6-0-5's story filled the gaps in her understanding and left enough space for the medicine. By far the most well-informed participant in the entire experiment, No. 6-1-3's individual results have given me a greater understanding concerning the selection of the test subjects. Choosing subjects with above-average intelligence and providing them with more comprehensive information leads to far fewer obstacles throughout the experimentation. On the contrary, it adds a degree of truth to those baseless fears from before. In the end, "truth" and "faith" are like the images seen on a phenakistoscope— "They can been seen, shaped, and discarded... but never touched." The same goes for her... and for me.

6-1-4 ???

A Page from ???'s Experiment File

A Page from ???'s Experiment File
No	6-1-4	Name	???	Inclination	Loses her identity
Test Indicators
1. Fraud		2. Weaves lie with truth		3. Role-playing
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	The hardest identity to imitate is her own.
	2. Methodology	This group is tasked to play a game based on the theme "Pinocchio." The 4 test subjects were asked to reverse "true and false." The rules require Subject 6-1-4 to use her true identity in the game, but she continued on with a false identity when introducing herself, and the other 3 test subjects acknowledged her false identity. Subject 6-1-4 was warned that same night. She reintroduced herself the next day, but the other 3 test subjects deduced that her true identity was false. Her "lies" convinced Subject 6-1-2 that she was the "liar" who caused the final "tragedy" in the prophecy. When she tried to explain the "truth" to Subject 6-1-2 at the end of the game, she couldn't gain Subject 6-1-2's trust, causing the tragedy between her and Subject 6-1-2.
	3. Analysis Summary	Subject 6-1-4 possessed a "fake" personality, and this led to an interesting outcome during the group experiment: The other test subjects could accept Subject 6-1-4's lies, but when she chose to be truthful, the truth became lies to others. Subject 6-1-4 lived her life with stolen identities, so her "false identities" were true to her, and her true self was the "false identity." Her perception of "true and false" deviated from the other test subjects. When asked to use her true identity, she and her group members recognized it as a lie. Subject 6-1-4 was calm and composed with a "false identity," acting as if it was her true identity. But when asked to use her real identity, she seemed flustered. It's inferred that Subject 6-1-4 is prepared to take on any identity except her own. She acts like an echo that can never speak on its own and only imitates the words of others. It is also the reason why the group experiment ended with tragic results for all 4 test subjects. It wasn't due to the lie like Subject 6-1-2 had expected. Conversely, it was the truth that no on believed.

6-0-5 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	6-0-5	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

6-1-6 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	6-1-6	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

8

8-0-1 Violetta

A Page from Violetta's Experiment File

A Page from Violetta's Experiment File
No	8-0-1	Name	Violetta	Inclination	A "tool" deceived by hope
Test Indicators
1. Marginalized		2. Blind kindness		3. Appeasing personality
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	No. 8-0-1 was constantly alienated by the others, and her kind personality made it worse.
	2. Procedure	It wasn't the plan to use the medicine on No. 8-0-1, and it didn't affect the subject's behavior as we thought it would anyway. Therefore, we've allotted a serial no. based on the results for now. No. 8-0-1 wasn't the core of this experiment, but her naive personality was worth looking into, so we didn't plan to use the medicine on No. 8-0-1. During the experiment, No. 8-0-1 never resisted when the others bullied her. The obedience she showed in pursuit of the goal made the bullying worse.
	3. Analysis	No. 8-0-1's behavioral pattern was simple and goal-oriented: completing the quest in accordance with the rules while trying to get allies by appeasing and obeying others. Her congenital disabilities and trauma molded no. 8-0-1's personality: with low self-esteem, she's weak and habitually chooses to avert when faced with bullying from others. Having been marginalized for so long. No. 8-0-1 longed to return to the stage and be valued by others. As she lacked experiences with positive emotions, she never doubted "hope" and even began believing in it blindly. The ultimate result was her underestimating the malicious nature of humans and languishing in illusory hope. In this experiment group, No. 8-0-1 was at the bottom. After No. 8-0-1 was hurt by No. 8-0-3, the "harmonious" vibe was shattered. The rabbit's emergence exposed the wolves' tracks. Looking at the group as a whole, No. 8-0-1 being hurt intensified conflicts. The research into No.8-0-1 wasn't of much value, and this subject is no longer useful. It may be worth looking into a by-product of this experiment - how will "evil" be affected when "kindness" is gone? Further research into this may be worthwhile.

8-?-2 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	8-?-2	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

8-0-3 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	8-0-3	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

8-1-4 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	8-1-4	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

8-?-5 Murro Morton

A Page from Murro Morton's Experiment File

A Page from Murro Morton's Experiment File
No	8-?-5	Name	Murro Morton	Inclination	A "hero" seeking self-worth in tradegy.
Test Indicators
1. Hero Complex		2. Lacking a Sense Belonging		3. Identity Crisis
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Subject 8-?-5's unique experiences during childhood made him question his self-worth and identity after leaving the circus. Even after escaping a life of being controlled, his perception of himself usually comes from others.
	2. Methodology	There was a clear division between the subjects of this group. Subject 8-?-5 and Subject 8-?-2 formed a union against Subject 8-0-3 and Subject 8-1-4. Subject 8-0-1 was marginalized, but frequently received assistance from Subject 8-?-5 and Subject 8-?-2. In the early stages of the experiment, Subject 8-?-5 revealed no urgency to accomplish any goals. His ally, Subject 8-?-2, revealed a greater sense of purpose instead. In the beginning, Subject 8-?-5 acted according to the situation, but while frequently assisting Subject 8-0-1, Subject 8-?-5 gradually developed a sense of awareness towards himself and his surroundings. He acknowledged his self-worth and "mission." The experiment in this group concluded with a destructive ending, and Subject 8-?-5 became the only survivor. However, when everyone but him was eliminated, the sense of belonging and self-awareness Subject 8-?-5 had built up over the course of the experiment collapsed once more. This resulted in him being the first to be eliminated from the 9th group before the experiment even began.
	3. Analysis Summary	Based on his experience, Subject 8-?-5's greatest need is to explore his value as a "person" and find a sense of belonging. Growing up in a circus, being trained as a "wildling"... all made him devoid of a sense of belonging. He wasn't a glamorous performer in the circus, nor was he an uncivilized savage or animal. Subject 8-?-5 was alienated from most in the circus, but during the experiment he was accepted into a group when forming alliances with others. Competing with his rivals allowed Subject 8-?-5 to gain self-affirmation of being regarded as a "person." But something established on the opinion of others is never stable. Once he is out of that specific environment, Subject 8-?-5 will once again become lost in a lack of self-awareness. Subject 8-?-5's hero complex may explain this. He detests being controlled by others, but the things he was taught since he was young made him instinctively rely on the predetermined. He hoped for a glamorous departure when leaving the circus, and he felt moved by his action when saving Subject 8-0-1 during the experiment. Through the experiment, he re-acquainted with other peers who weren't performers and established himself as a hero in reality. But as the experiment came to an end and everyone left, the only survivor, Subject 8-?-5, was once again "isolated" from a group. He lost his sense of belonging and fell into emptiness.

9

9-?-1Kurt Frank

A Page from Kurt Frank's Experiment File

A Page from Kurt Frank's Experiment File
NO	9-?-1	Name	Kurt Frank	Inclination	A fantasist disassociated with reality
Test Indicators
1. Avoidant personality disorder		2. Curiosity killed the cat
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Due to his avoidant personality disorder, No. 9-?-1 desperately wants approval from others. The fantasies and fabricated experiences were tools for evading anxiety and self-protection. Yet these became his downfall when he's among a group of people trying to hide their secrets.
	2. Methodology	The commonality of this group of participants was that they all had a secret: either to get ride of their past or to maintain a disguise. Except for No. 9-?-1, the other all suspected each other, and their secrets were on the edge of being unveiled. Initially, No. 9-?-1 wasn't in the middle of the conflict, but he was excessively proactive. He was the first to discover No. 8-?-5 who survived the last round which got No. 9-?-3 suspicious. After observing other carefully, No. 9-?-1 wrote an adventure novel based on fantasy rather than reality, which for No. 9-?-3 even more suspicious. Despite that his action wasn't malicious, he was ticked off by the paranoid and highly dangerous No. 9-?-3. No. 9-?-1 disassociated with the conflict but was the first one ousted and was used by No. 9-?-3 as the fuse to oust No. 9-?-4 later on.|-
	3. Analysis Summary	No. 9-?-1's experiences prompted his avoidant personality disorder. He was extra sensitive about others' opinions of him and fearful of criticism, isolation, and disagreement. No. 9-?-1 was scared of being excluded in a group. On the one hand, he forced other to communicate with him as he was desperate to prove himself to them. No. 9-?-1 even fabricated the contents of his diaries, affecting the experiment's records and conclusion to a certain degree. No. 9-?-1 was ousted mainly as a result of his excessive self-awareness and indulgence in fantasy. However, the fact that the participants in this group would do anything to hide their secrets was the fundamental reason why they ousted one after another. The closer their disguise was to being unveiled, the more extreme the measures people would take to cover it up. The sense of danger that their secret would be exposed could easily ignite hatred and make people harm one another. In fact, we might not even need the medicine...

9-?-3 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	9-?-3	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……

9-?-4 TBD

A Page from TBD's Experiment File

A Page from TBD's Experiment File
No	9-?-4	Name	TBD	Inclination	Coming Soon……
Test Indicators
1. Coming Soon……		2. Coming Soon……		3. Coming Soon……
Test Results	1. Overall Evaluation	Coming Soon……
	2. Methodology	Coming Soon……
	3. Experiment Summary	Coming Soon……